Operating Leverage Analysis
See how three sales cases change EBIT when variable costs scale and fixed costs stay in place.
2026 · three named sales scenarios
Synthetic example · EUR thousands; other units as labeledCalculated model excerpt
| Input / result | Downside | Base | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue reference | 1,800.00 | 2,000.00 | 2,200.00 |
| Variable cost | 1,080.00 | 1,200.00 | 1,320.00 |
| Fixed overhead | 500.00 | 500.00 | 500.00 |
| D&A | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
| EBIT | 170.00 | 250.00 | 330.00 |
| Sales change · % | -10.00 | 0.00 | 10.00 |
| EBIT change · % | -32.00 | 0.00 | 32.00 |
Free · No signup
The link opens your financial model. The illustrated example is not loaded automatically.
How much does EBIT move when sales change?
Example Company has one full forecast year, 2026. The question is how its given cost structure amplifies a sales change. This is a worked scenario interpretation within the Financial Operating Model; the cost structure is supplied rather than inferred.
Hold the cost relationship constant across named cases
In EUR thousands, Base revenue is 2,000, Downside 1,800 and Upside 2,200. A variable COGS line uses 60% of Business Line A’s revenue. Fixed overhead is 500 and depreciation is 50 in every case. Opening PP&E and equity are each 500. Other opening balances, taxes, financing, capex and working-capital inputs are zero.
The three named scenarios override only the revenue Amount input. The variable cost reference recalculates; fixed overhead and depreciation remain unchanged. Fixed and Variable Cost Model explains cost construction, while Scenario Modeling owns the general override workflow.
Reconcile the sales-to-EBIT response
Base EBIT is 2,000 − 1,200 − 500 − 50 = 250. Downside EBIT is 1,800 − 1,080 − 500 − 50 = 170. Upside EBIT is 2,200 − 1,320 − 500 − 50 = 330. Depreciation is separated so EBIT is not confused with EBITDA.
Against Base, sales change by −10% and +10%; EBIT changes by (170 − 250) / 250 = −32% and (330 − 250) / 250 = +32%. Each 200 sales change contributes 80 after the 60% variable cost. That 80 is large compared with starting EBIT of 250 because fixed overhead and depreciation already absorb 550.
2026 · explicit sales cases
| Input / result | Downside | Base | Upside |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue reference | 1,800.00 | 2,000.00 | 2,200.00 |
| Variable cost | 1,080.00 | 1,200.00 | 1,320.00 |
| Fixed overhead | 500.00 | 500.00 | 500.00 |
| D&A | 50.00 | 50.00 | 50.00 |
| EBIT | 170.00 | 250.00 | 330.00 |
| Sales change · % | -10.00 | 0.00 | 10.00 |
| EBIT change · % | -32.00 | 0.00 | 32.00 |
Interpret the amplification within this range
The larger EBIT percentage change comes from the fixed burden relative to starting profit, not from changing the variable cost rate. Upside sales add profit without another 500 of overhead; downside sales leave the same fixed burden to cover. The calculation compares explicit cases and is not a native Degree of Operating Leverage output.
This interpretation is local to the supplied relationship and positive Base EBIT. Percentage changes become unstable near zero EBIT and misleading when a loss changes sign. It does not establish a universally sustainable cost ratio or show which real-world driver matters most. For broader margins and returns use Profitability Analysis; EBIT owns the earnings measure.
Reproduce the named sales cases
1. Download the native three-scenario file, open the financial model and explicitly select Manage models → Import. Advanced mode contains Business Line A, the linked 60% COGS line, fixed overhead 500 and depreciation 50. Select Downside, Base and Upside and compare EBIT. The CTA imports nothing automatically.
2. To rebuild, create a blank 2026 model with zero actual years, one forecast year, EUR and thousands. Enter opening PP&E and equity 500 each. Under Revenue → Model use Amount 2,000; under COGS → Model use Percentage of Reference, Business Line A, 60%. Under Operating Expenses → Model use Amount 500. Enter depreciation 50 and leave unrelated inputs zero.
3. In the existing Downside scenario set revenue to 1,800 and in Upside set it to 2,200, leaving Base at 2,000. Keep the reference and cost inputs inherited. Read revenue, COGS, overhead, depreciation and EBIT from each evaluated case. Calculate the two percentage changes against Base as shown above.
Where the analysis stops
BalanceCheat evaluates the manually defined scenarios. This page does not promise a DOL calculator, automatically generated scenario matrix, general sensitivity engine, attribution, tornado chart or driver ranking. To change the sales forecast itself, use Revenue Model.