BalanceCheat
ENDE

INTERPRET RESULTS

Positive DCF value does not finance negative interim cash flows

Negative FCFF does not automatically make a DCF unavailable or prove that EBITDA is negative. A business can have positive operating earnings, invest more than it generates and still show positive going-concern value. Funding the transition remains a separate problem.

Native DCF bridge · EURk · same valuation date
ComponentBaseStress
Explicit FCFF PV23.506-28.546
Terminal PV395.734395.734
Enterprise Value419.24367.188
Terminal PV / EV94.39%107.77%
Peak closing cash deficit40100
On this page
  1. Reconstruct the transition from native operating inputs
  2. Keep terminal value separate from the explicit forecast
  3. Stress early cash burn and read terminal dependence
  4. Review whether the transition can be funded
  5. Additional reconciled variants
  6. Related decisions and model reference

Reconstruct the transition from native operating inputs

The synthetic 2027–2031 model has revenue and EBITDA EURk 100 each year, zero cash tax, D&A and operating NWC, and capex 130 / 110 / 90 / 70 / 50. Consequently FCFF is −30 / −10 / 10 / 30 / 50. Negative first-year FCFF is driven by investment, not negative EBITDA.

Opening cash and debt are zero; automatic financing and available commitment are zero. The DCF uses valuation date 2026-12-31, year-end timing, WACC 10% and perpetual growth 2%. The current engine’s exclusive period-end dates give times 1.002739726 to 5.002739726 years, which the reconciliation preserves.

Forecast FCFF and closing cash · EURk
YearBase FCFFBase cashStress FCFFStress cash
2027-30-30-60-60
2028-10-40-40-100
202910-3010-90
203030030-60
2031505050-10

Keep terminal value separate from the explicit forecast

Terminal FCFF is 50 × 1.02 = EURk 51. Undiscounted terminal value is 51 / (10% − 2%) = EURk 637.5. Discount that terminal value at the native final time and add the individual discounted FCFFs. The result is the Enterprise Value in the table, with no cash/debt bridge adjustment in this zero-opening-debt case.

A valid perpetual-growth denominator requires WACC above growth. A positive terminal FCFF also needs a defensible sustainable operating and reinvestment basis. The arithmetic does not establish that the assumed transition will occur.

Stress early cash burn and read terminal dependence

Raise the first two capex amounts to 160 and 140, leaving all other assumptions unchanged. FCFF becomes −60 / −40 / 10 / 30 / 50. Explicit-period PV is now negative while total EV remains positive. Terminal PV therefore exceeds 100% of EV in this stress case; it does not do so in Base.

As a separate terminal check on Base, lowering perpetual growth to 1% at the same WACC and date gives native EV EURk 371.821. This changes terminal economics, unlike the early-capex stress, which leaves terminal value unchanged.

Download the synthetic example, explicitly import it under Model, select Advanced and open Value → DCF. Import creates a separate model with inspectable inputs and sources.

Review whether the transition can be funded

With no external financing, Base reaches a EURk 40 cash deficit after year two; stress reaches EURk 100. A positive DCF is a discounted value calculation, not cash available to pay those bills. Negative cash is a visible funding shortfall, not an assumed authorized overdraft.

Use the financing schedule to specify actual sources, access conditions, rates and dates. If survival depends on funding that is unavailable, a going-concern DCF alone is incomplete. This example supplies no distress probability, credit approval or investment recommendation.

Additional reconciled variants

These native files reproduce the discussed variants separately: Base with 1% terminal growth.

Related decisions and model reference

For adjacent questions: DCF Valuation Model; Free Cash Flow to the Firm: FCFF Calculation for DCF; Terminal Value Normalization: Rebuild Sustainable FCFF; Cross-Check a DCF Terminal Value: Implied Multiple and Growth.

For the exact controls and source behavior, use DCF workflow and outputs and Terminal methods and cross-checks.

Sources and conventions

Synthetic examples. Model-based results were reconciled with the current BalanceCheat calculations; assumptions, units and boundaries are specified in each example.