Revenue per Employee Model
Link revenue to employee capacity using average FTE and an explicit productivity assumption for each group.
July hires contribute for part of the year
Synthetic example · Money in EUR thousands; other units as labeledCalculated model excerpt
| Line item | No hires | July hires |
|---|---|---|
| Closing FTE · Group A | 6 | 8 |
| Average FTE · Group A | 6 | 7.01 |
| Revenue · Group A | 1,200.0 | 1,401.6 |
| Revenue · Group B | 300.0 | 300.0 |
| Revenue | 1,500.0 | 1,701.6 |
| Personnel cost | 595.2 | 681.1 |
Free · No signup
The link opens your financial model. The illustrated example is not loaded automatically.
Build a workforce-based revenue forecast
The task is to forecast Business Line A’s 2026 revenue from two employee groups. This personnel-capacity model uses a specific relationship: sum of each linked group’s average FTE × annual revenue per FTE. It is a workforce-based capacity forecast within the Revenue Model, with productivity entered explicitly rather than estimated automatically.
Set separate employee-group assumptions
Employee Group A opens with six FTE, hires two on July 1 and has annual revenue per FTE of EUR 200,000. Salary is EUR 60,000 per FTE, bonus 10%, burden 20% of salary plus bonus and one-time hiring cost EUR 3,000 per hire. Employee Group B has two FTE all year, revenue per FTE of EUR 150,000, salary EUR 50,000, bonus zero and burden 20%.
Both groups link to the same revenue line, with a separate revenue-per-FTE assumption for each relationship. There are no departures. The comparison case removes only Group A’s July hire. All opening balances, direct costs, other expenses, taxes, investment and working-capital inputs are zero; this is not a complete business budget.
Reconcile the hire’s partial-period revenue and cost
The July hire raises Group A’s closing FTE from six to eight, but average FTE is 6 + 2 × 184/365 = 7.0082. Its revenue is 1,401.64 in EUR thousands. Group B contributes 2 × 150 = 300, giving total revenue of 1,701.64.
Without the hire, Group A contributes 1,200 and total revenue is 1,500. The hire adds 201.64 this year, not the full-year 400 implied by two additional closing FTE. Group A personnel cost is 561.05, including 6 of hiring costs. Group B costs 120; together they cost 681.05.
Subtracting personnel cost gives EBITDA of 1,020.59. Compared with the no-hire case, personnel expense rises by 85.85 and EBITDA by 115.79. Those are conditional model outputs before any additional delivery or overhead costs.
Employee groups · with July hire
| Line item | Group A | Group B |
|---|---|---|
| Opening FTE | 6 | 2 |
| Closing FTE | 8 | 2 |
| Average FTE | 7.01 | 2 |
| Revenue / FTE · EUR / year | 200,000 | 150,000 |
| Annual salary / FTE · EUR | 60,000 | 50,000 |
| Group revenue | 1,401.6 | 300.0 |
| Group personnel cost | 561.1 | 120.0 |
No hire vs July hire · company totals
| Line item | No hires | July hires |
|---|---|---|
| Average FTE · Group A | 6 | 7.01 |
| Revenue · Group A | 1,200.0 | 1,401.6 |
| Revenue · Group B | 300.0 | 300.0 |
| Revenue | 1,500.0 | 1,701.6 |
| Personnel cost | 595.2 | 681.1 |
| EBITDA | 904.8 | 1,020.6 |
Interpret productivity separately from staffing
The hiring date determines time-weighted FTE; the productivity assumption determines the revenue attributed to that time. Closing FTE describes the year-end team and must not replace average FTE in the annual relationship. Group A and B have different productivity and compensation, so an undifferentiated employee average would hide the mix.
Revenue per FTE is a supplied annual assumption. The model does not infer demand, utilization, billable hours, machine capacity or scheduling constraints. Its capacity interpretation is strictly workforce-based. The Hiring Ramp Model isolates timing and costs, while the Headcount Model covers the broader personnel setup.
Reproduce the workforce relationship
1. Download the synthetic employee-revenue file. Open the financial model and explicitly select Manage models → Import. It contains a full 2026 forecast, EUR and thousands, the two employee groups and Group A’s dated July hire. The current workspace has no personnel-event editor; the existing file importer preserves that schedule. The main CTA does not import it.
2. Switch to Advanced. Under Personnel → Model inspect Employee Groups A and B, FTE × Compensation, salary Amount and the compensation assumptions above. Expand Additional compensation & one-time costs to check average FTE and cost components. Leave the stored annual FTE targets unset so they do not override the dated schedule.
3. Under Revenue → Model inspect Business Line A, choose FTE × Revenue / FTE, and use Link employee group for A and B. Revenue / FTE for this line is 200 for A and 150 for B in the thousands display. These relationship amounts are distinct from each group’s salary. Compare the calculated contributions and total above.
Extend the line without overstating capacity
Use Bottom-Up Revenue Forecast to combine this employee-linked line with other revenue methods. Use the Employee Cost Calculator for isolated compensation and the Financial Operating Model for other expenses. Revenue per employee is not a guarantee of achievable sales or a workforce optimization recommendation. Displayed values are rounded; the engine uses unrounded day weights.